Expert-Led IT Transformation
ENSHARE
The landscape
Manufacturing IT teams are asked to do more than their current model allows
The transformation agenda facing manufacturing IT has not shortened. Network modernization, cloud connectivity, OT/IT security segmentation, compliance with NIS2 and equivalent frameworks, and the infrastructure requirements of digital twins, edge analytics and real-time production systems: these programs are running in parallel, often across dozens of countries, and they are running on teams that were not scaled to absorb them.
The talent gap is structural and persistent. A global shortage of cybersecurity and network engineering expertise is forcing manufacturing organizations to reconsider how transformation work gets done. Boards and CISOs cite skills gaps as chronic strategic risks. The response, across sectors, is a shift toward outcomebased managed services and blended sourcing models: retaining internal expertise for strategic direction while placing program execution, technical delivery and ongoing service governance with partners who have the depth and global reach to deliver at scale.1
The problem is the operational model required to execute the roadmap transformation.
The gap between what manufacturing IT teams are asked to deliver and the resources available to deliver it creates a predictable set of outcomes: transformation programs that slip on timelines because no one owns the coordination of carriers, factory change windows and cross-regional approvals; standards applied inconsistently because governance lives in documents rather than platforms; compliance evidence assembled manually before each audit cycle; and internal engineers who spend their time managing vendor escalations instead of improving lines, safety and production system.
60%
now classifies most large manufacturers as “essential or important entities,” raising requirements for incident reporting, risk management and supply chain security.
managed services and blended sourcing models are the emerging norm as manufacturers shift program execution to specialist partners while retaining internal strategic direction.
ISACA / industry consensus, 2023–2025
Why transformation programs stall
Carrier coordination, plant change windows, cross-regional approvals, compliance reporting, in-life service governance: these are operational problems, not technology problems. They require a partner with global reach, manufacturing expertise and service management discipline to own them end-to-end.
Project backlog
Governance gaps
Compliance pressure
Where GTT comes in
Built for the execution demands of global manufacturing transformation
The approach
Why expert-led IT transformation is an execution argument, not a capability discussion
Manufacturing organizations evaluating transformation partners typically assess technical capabilities: network architecture, security tooling, platform features. These are necessary but insufficient. The factor that most reliably determines whether a global program lands on time, on standard and with the outcomes it was designed to deliver is execution accountability — and specifically, whether a single partner owns the full delivery chain from program scoping to in-life service management.
GTT’s approach is built on that accountability. GTT owns the program from initiation to run-state: project management across carrier coordination, factory scheduling and change control; technical management across architecture, cutover playbooks and post-deployment tuning; and service management across incident, problem and change in the run environment. Our Professional Services expertise, coordinated through The GTT Envision Platform, ensure that governance and visibility are embedded in the delivery, not reported manually after the fact.
| Without Dedicated Program and Service Ownership | With GTT Expert-Led IT Transformation |
|---|---|
| Transformation programs managed across internal IT teams alongside existing run responsibilities, with no dedicated resource to drive complex multiregion delivery. | End-to-end program accountability from GTT, from scoping and carrier coordination through cutover, golive and in-life service management. |
| Carrier coordination, factory change windows and cross-regional approvals managed ad-hoc, creating timeline risk across every site deployment. | GTT manages carrier relationships, factory scheduling and change control centrally, removing the coordination burden from internal teams. |
| Standards defined centrally but applied inconsistently across plants and regions due to fragmented implementation oversight. | Consistent technical standards enforced across every site through GTT EnvisionCORE, propagated centrally, not applied manually per location. |
| Compliance evidence assembled manually before each audit cycle from fragmented logs and regional reports. | Continuous governance and audit-ready KPIs available on demand through GTT EnvisionDX, built into the architecture, not bolted on before reviews. |
| Internal engineers diverted from production, safety and innovation priorities to manage vendor escalations and service issues. | Internal specialists focused on high-value engineering work; GTT owns incident management, problem resolution and continuous improvement. |
The solution
One partner. Accountable for the full delivery chain.
GTT’s Expert-Led IT Transformation places program, project, technical and service management with a single partner accountable for delivery from initial scope through in-life governance, backed by the GTT Envision Platform and GTT’s global managed and professional services infrastructure.
Unlike providers that deliver technology and hand back operational responsibility to internal teams, GTT retains accountability for how the program performs in delivery and in run. For manufacturing organizations executing complex, multi-region transformations with lean IT teams, that accountability model is the operational difference between a program that delivers its intended outcomes and one that achieves initial deployment but fails to sustain or scale.
Core capabilities supporting manufacturing IT transformation
Technical Management (Architecture, Cutover, Tuning)
Service Management (Incident, Problem, Change, CX Governance)
GTT Envision Platform (Governance, Visibility, Compliance Reporting)
24/7 Global NOC and SOC Support
The platform advantage
Governance and visibility embedded in the delivery — not reported after the fact
The proof
What manufacturing customers achieve with GTT
BARRY CALLEBAUT | Food & Beverage Manufacturing — 130+ sites globally
Barry Callebaut, one of the world’s largest chocolate and cocoa producers, operates at a scale that makes transformation execution a distinct and demanding discipline: 130+ sites across continents, with production, distribution and supply chain systems that depend on consistent connectivity and cloud access.
Prior to engaging GTT, the company managed a patchwork of local networks and legacy connectivity models that created inconsistent performance across regions and placed ongoing operational management on internal IT teams.
GTT deployed managed SD-WAN across Barry Callebaut’s global footprint, backed by Professional Services spanning program, project, technical and service management — driving a consistent global delivery model from initial planning and pilot through to ongoing service assurance. A single GTT team owned end-to-end accountability across the entire rollout.
“GTT’s global SD-WAN solution gives us the flexibility, agility, and performance we need to optimize our business-critical applications and operations worldwide.”
— Jean-Jacques Tripp, Global Network Manager, Barry Callebaut
Outcome: Managed SD-WAN deployed across 130+ sites with consistent application performance for production, logistics and cloud collaboration; simplified global operations through a single accountable partner; and reduced internal IT burden through centralized management and a single global service model.
Why GTT
Built for the transformation execution demands of global manufacturing
Most network and security providers can deploy technology reliably in a single environment. The challenge that determines whether a global manufacturing transformation program succeeds is different. Can a provider own end-to-end execution across hundreds of sites and multiple continents — coordinating local carriers in thirty countries, scheduling deployments within tight factory change windows, enforcing consistent technical standards without local deviation, and then managing the run environment with full service accountability — while the internal IT team continues to run day-to-day operations without disruption?
This is the problem GTT is specifically built to solve. Three capabilities — aligned to GTT’s core commitment to connect, secure and simplify — combine to make that possible:
| Tier-1 Global Backbone & Carrier Reach | GTT Envision Platform | End-to-end Program Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| GTT’s top-ranked global IP backbone covers 400+ points of presence across six continents. GTT’s carrier relationships and local delivery capability across EMEA, the Americas, APAC, the Middle East and Africa mean that multi-region manufacturing programs do not stall waiting for local providers to be coordinated. One commercial relationship. One delivery team. One SLA across the entire estate. | The GTT Envision Platform embeds governance directly into the delivery architecture. GTT EnvisionCORE enforces consistent policy and standards across every site. GTT EnvisionEDGE provides real-time telemetry to validate post-change performance. GTT EnvisionDX delivers executive-ready KPIs and audit-ready compliance evidence available on demand, not assembled manually before reviews. | GTT’s Professional Services team owns the full delivery chain: program scoping, project management, technical architecture, cutover planning and execution, and in-life service management. Internal IT teams are not handed a handover document at go-live. GTT retains accountability for service performance, continuous improvement and compliance evidence through the full life of the program. |
Manufacturing sub-verticals served
Expert-led transformation adapted across every manufacturing sub-vertical
| Automotive & EV | Multi-region SD-WAN and SASE rollouts coordinated across tier-1 and tier-2 supplier networks, TISAX-compliant change governance, dedicated program management for plant-level cutover and change control. |
| Food & Beverage | Transformation delivery across 100+ global sites, professional services supporting SAP and cloud migration programs, ongoing service management for production-critical applications and supply chain systems. |
| Chemicals & Materials | Governance-heavy transformation programs with COMAH and SEVESO change control requirements, NIS2-aligned compliance reporting, expert-led security posture improvement across OT-connected production sites. |
| Packaging | Managed rollout of unified WAN and cloud connectivity across distributed production and logistics operations, centralized service governance replacing fragmented regional management models. |
| Building Materials | Global transformation program delivery across European and international manufacturing estates, audit-ready SLA and KPI reporting for board-level governance, continuous improvement managed through the GTT Envision Platform. |
| Industrial Equipment & Automation | Complex multi-carrier coordination across engineering-heavy international operations, technical management for OT/IT interlock and security posture improvement programs across distributed plant environments. |
Next steps
Starting the conversation
Assess your current program accountability model: Identify where ownership gaps exist in your current transformation programs — carrier coordination, change governance, in-life service management — and where internal teams are absorbing operational work that a delivery partner should own.
Identify talent and capacity gaps across your transformation roadmap: Assess where internal teams lack the network engineering, cybersecurity or program management depth to execute on timeline, and where a specialist delivery partner can close those gaps without the lead time and risk of recruitment cycles.
Map compliance reporting requirements: Determine whether NIS2, CMMC or equivalent frameworks require audit-ready evidence of risk management, incident reporting and business continuity that your current architecture and reporting model can reliably produce.
Evaluate your run environment governance: Review whether in-life service management — incident, problem, change — is managed against agreed outcomes with clear accountability, or whether internal teams are absorbing escalations that a managed services partner should resolve.
Engage GTT: Contact GTT to map Expert-Led IT Transformation to your manufacturing operations and establish the program and service management model your modernization requires.
Manufacturing transformation programs do not fail on technology. They fail on execution.
1 ISACA, State of Cybersecurity, 2023
What is Expert-Led IT Transformation?
A delivery model where GTT owns program, project, technical and service management end-to-end from initial scoping through cutover and ongoing run-state governance. Internal IT teams retain strategic direction. GTT retains accountability for execution and performance.
Why do global manufacturing transformation programs stall?
Because the work that determines success—carrier coordination, factory scheduling, cross-regional approvals, compliance reporting, in-life service management—is operational, not technical. Most programs lack a single accountable partner for that execution chain, and internal teams absorb the coordination burden on top of day-to-day run work.
What does GTT take accountability for?
Project management across carrier coordination, factory scheduling and change control. Technical management across architecture, cutover playbooks and post-deployment tuning. Service management across incident, problem and change. And continuous performance against agreed outcomes through the full life of the program.
How does this help with NIS2 and other compliance frameworks?
NIS2 classifies most large manufacturers as essential or important entities, raising requirements for incident reporting, risk management and supply chain security.
Continuous audit-ready evidence is available on demand through the GTT Envision Platform — built into the architecture from day one, not assembled manually before each audit cycle.
What happens to our internal team?
Webinar
White Paper
Guide
Guide
Guide
White Paper
White Paper
White Paper
White Paper
White Paper
Global WAN Services